被CHI2008光荣reject

没有做学术的天分 我还是老老实实读个master工作去吧

不过顶级会议就是顶级会议啊

acceptance rate只有18%

p.s.有一个审稿人居然还很认真的指出了我几个语法错误，，，

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Zao Fan,

Thank you very much for submitting to CHI 2008 Notes. We are sorry to
tell you that we are not able to include your Notes submission, 145,
Personality Need Factors and Social Web Service, in the conference
program.

We received 340 submissions and were able to accept 18% of them, which
required making difficult choices and rejecting several submissions
that were highly rated by some of their reviewers. The decisions as
to which submissions to accept were made after careful reviews by a
number of highly qualified professionals around the world. At the end
of this message are the reviews for your submission. We hope these
will be useful to you.

If you submitted a rebuttal to the reviews, be assured that it was
read by a member of the program committee. We appreciate your
participation in the research community and look forward to future
submissions of your work.

------------------------ Paper 145, Review 1 ------------------------
Overall Rating

3 (3 - Possibly reject: This seems below the line, but I'm not
deadset against it. )

------------------------ Paper 145, Review 2 ------------------------
Overall Rating

2 (Reject: I would argue for rejecting this paper.)

------------------------ Paper 145, Review 3 ------------------------
4 (Borderline: Overall I would not argue for accepting or rejecting
this paper.)